[Supply of Medical Aids in home Mechanical Ventilation: needs-Based and Safe? - The Views of Stakeholders Related to the Care Process on the Current Status and Perspectives]. / Beatmungsspezifische Hilfsmittelversorgung ­ bedarfsgerecht und sicher?

INTRODUCTION: The supply of medical aids is essential for patients with home mechanical ventilation. However, it is largely unclear to what extent this supply is needs-based and safe. METHODS: As part of a health services research project, 20 expert interviews were conducted with a heterogeneous group of stakeholders related to ventilation-specific medical aids supply. The interviews were analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: The interviewees pointed to challenges and problems regarding structural, procedural and personal aspects at all levels of medical aids supply. In particular, deficits in task performance, coordination and cooperation between the stakeholders and authorities involved became apparent. Such might result in avoidable safety risks and hinder needs-oriented supply of medical aids. CONCLUSION: Further development in ventilation-associated medical aids supply is needed, with focus on evidence-based practices, a comprehensive, cross-sectoral and cross-professional design as well as systematic evaluation.

["Ensuring patient safety is one of our primary responsibilities." - Results of a qualitative study on maintaining safety in ventilation-associated technical aid supply]. / "Es ist eine unserer Hauptaufgaben, die Sicherheit der Patienten zu gewährleisten." ­ Ergebnisse einer qualitativen Studie zur Gewährleistung von Sicherheit in der beatmungsspezifischen Hilfsmittelversorgung.

BACKGROUND: Maintaining safety is critical in home mechanical ventilation (HMV). It is co-determined by the availability of reliable technical aids and their correct application. Ensuring safe aid supply is part of the aid providers'́ legal mandate. However, whether and how this is achieved is largely unknown. Therefore, the tasks of technical aid providers, associated requirements and challenges with special regards to educational and safety aspects were investigated. METHODS: For this purpose, episodic interviews were conducted between July and December 2020 with a purposive sample of field representatives of eleven technical aid providers. Between one and six persons participated in each of the interviews, resulting in a total sample of 25 persons (14 field representatives without management function, ten with management function, one director). Given the conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic, six interviews took place face-to-face and five as web meetings. Interviews were analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: From the interviewees'́ perspective, the most important safety-related measure is the legally required and individually tailored initial instruction in a safe aid application. Additional safety-related tasks comprise counselling, e. g. for prescribing physicians and users (patients, relatives, nursing service employees), regular home visits, and the provision of a technical emergency service. Interviewees indicate that safety risks emerge primarily from a lack of skills and a high staff turnover among professional caregivers. This, they state, challenges building up and maintaining competencies among nursing staff. Other safety risks arise from healthcare fragmentation, lacking coordination, cooperation, and accountability of the professionals involved. Respondents address these challenges pragmatically by providing additional services, like ongoing caregiver training, care coordination and support roles. DISCUSSION: Maintaining safety in ventilation-associated technical aid supply must be considered a crucial component of the overall HMV care processes, in which safety currently cannot be taken for granted. Field representatives of technical aid providers address the existing challenges with selective and intuitive strategies, some of which exceed their legal mandate. CONCLUSION: Improving safety in home care can be supported by establishing Advanced Nursing Practice roles in nursing services. The systematic further development of roles and tasks of staff of technical aid providers should be clarified within an overarching discourse on viable approaches to cross-sectoral and interprofessional HMV care.

Infrastructure- and workforce capacity for the provision of health care to people with invasive home mechanical ventilation: A scoping review of indicators and norms.

INTRODUCTION: Both the availability and adequacy of infrastructure- and workforce capacity are critical to provide integrated and continuing care, especially to people with complex care needs such as those with invasive home mechanical ventilation (HMV). This review aims to synthesise indicators and norms that are available for assessing this infrastructure- and workforce capacity. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted by searching PubMed, Livivo, the grey literature, specific registries, and the websites of relevant professional societies for international publications on specific infrastructure- and workforce capacity indicators or norms on HMV from January 2000 up to and including March 2021. Exclusion criteria comprised missing indicator/norm information, differing populations/care settings, and secondary literature. Indicators and norms were extracted, clustered, and analysed by applying the WHO Monitoring and Evaluation Framework and qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Fifteen publications met the inclusion criteria. Forty-five indicators and 44 norms on HMV-related infrastructure- and workforce capacity were synthesised. The synthesis revealed a heterogeneous set of indicators and norms (mainly from cross-sectional surveys and guidelines). The methodological information on their definition, rationales, disaggregation, and evidence is scarce. CONCLUSION: To enable integrated care in HMV and comparable populations with complex care needs, the identified limitations in assessing infrastructure- and workforce capacity should be addressed.

Long-Term Care for Tracheotomised Patients With or Without Invasive Ventilation. Lessons Learned from a Scoping Review of International Concepts.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with long-term tracheostomies, with or without mechanical ventilation have complex and comprehensive healthcare needs. The number of patients is increasing internationally. Evidence suggests poor healthcare quality and outcomes, especially in Germany. Against this background, we searched for international concepts tailoring healthcare to these special needs, their key characteristics and results from their evaluations. METHODS: A scoping review was performed in 2018 based on a systematic search of scientific databases and grey literature without restrictions to publication type. Key information was charted and thematically analysed based on the taxonomy of integrated care. Evaluations were analysed descriptively. RESULTS: Seventy-nine publications related to 25 programmes from five countries were included. Healthcare concepts are usually regionally adapted and tertiary sector-based with a cross-sectoral approach. Care coordination responsibility is usually assigned to advanced nurse practitioners, embedded in multi-professional programme teams. Interventions consist of specialised needs-based clinical services combined with care coordination, homecare support and education. Evaluation of concepts is scarce, but existing results indicate beneficial effects on patient-related outcomes, care coordination, healthcare utilisation and costs. CONCLUSIONS: The concepts available in the literature are often poorly described and rarely evaluated. Research is needed on their impact on healthcare quality and outcomes. However, several key characteristics were identified, which should be considered when developing and implementing integrated and needs-based approaches for the patient group in Germany and beyond.

Healthcare needs of vulnerable patient groups: available data and existing gaps in Germany with respect to long-term mechanical ventilation.

AIM: Long-term invasively ventilated patients exhibit exceptional and resource-intensive healthcare needs. However, major knowledge gaps in Germany complicate appropriate approaches to best address these demands. This paper evaluates available information on the patient group and their healthcare needs from German data sources and derives implications for healthcare planning and regulation by national/federal self-governing bodies, political decision-makers, and specialized providers. METHODS: Based on the concept of needs, we addressed the normative dimension typically characterized by epidemiological data. Based on existing German health system data resources, an explorative approach was utilized to identify and characterize available databases providing information on the patient group and/or their healthcare. RESULTS: To date, no available database provides information on the healthcare needs of this patient group. As of the reporting year 2017, the diagnosis-related groups (DRG) statistics will provide hospital-specific data on home invasive ventilation interventions, but the data do not provide information on long-term care. Claims data may be a promising source for cross-sectoral evaluation of healthcare needs but feature methodological challenges. These results call for efforts to address limited data eligibility, adopt a broader understanding of healthcare needs, and identify actions needed to evidence informed and needs-oriented healthcare. CONCLUSION: Future approaches on needs-oriented specialized healthcare should close the existing knowledge gap based on reliable data. In addition to normative information, they should consider subjective dimensions on a life course perspective and quantitative and qualitative service performance characteristics across multiple sectors and professions.